What is socionics: table of people’s relationships and socionic personality types

There are different relationships between different socionic types. Since there are 16 sociotypes, then, accordingly, there should be 16 types of relationships between them. However, in fact, there are 14 types of relationships, just in two of them there are two different roles, of which a person can perform only one.

Business relationship
Dual Relationships, or Complete Complement
Mirror relationships
Conflict relationships
Mirage relationships
Activation Relationships
Quasi-identity relations
A relationship of complete opposites
Half-complement relations
Audit relationships (auditor and auditee)
Social order relationships (customer and receiver)
Superego relationships
Family relationships
Identical relations

Business relationship

Relationships of this kind are calm, even, the partners understand each other well in their creative function, they are frank, but they do not know how to help each other or support each other morally. Business relationships develop into a rivalry of behavioral styles, requiring constant probing of a competitor who is not inferior to you. In a mobilized state, relationships improve, partners quickly unite against a common enemy or common difficulty. A calm state worsens them, and grievances over trifles begin to arise. A couple can eagerly look for weaknesses in each other's positions. Business relationships are based on logic. They make people calculating, weighing and evaluating everything from a pragmatic point of view. One logical plan is replaced by another, everyone insists on their own version. In a welded business couple, feelings are entirely subordinated to the logic of achieving success. Business relationships strengthen the power sensory of partners, make them more competitive, and develop the ability to realistically assess the balance of power. A business couple should not take on long-term tasks. These relationships encourage partners to achieve short-term goals that promise tangible returns. Business relationships are also built on a balance of power. But, unlike the superego, here the partners do not restore, but on the contrary, they strive to upset the balance in their favor. These relationships are tiring with a constant struggle for authority, leadership, and significance. In disputes, they are not looking for the truth, but are looking for weaknesses in the position of the other side. In business relationships, partners act using seemingly similar methods, but achieve completely different goals. Therefore, competition is growing, pushing both back. After rethinking their actions, the partners again come together for a new leap forward and an even more dangerous failure. Everyone believes that the goal set by others is incorrect. At the later stages of development of business relationships, any desire to be similar to each other disappears.

Relations of business equality with elements of rivalry and competition with different goals of partners. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one partner falls on the role function of the other (hence the competition and struggle for leadership in relationships), the observational function falls on the suggestive one, and the creative, painful, activation and demonstrative functions coincide (common interests and cooperation usually lie in the creative zone partner functions).

Principles of working with this table

Relationships between psychotypes in socionics
To easily work with this table, you need to know your own socionic psychotype, which can be determined using a small test. In addition, you need to know the psychotypes of people who are in your environment and with whom you need to establish relationships, and also learn how to behave with them. The algorithm for working with this table is extremely simple:

Find your psychotype in the leftmost column of the table.
Select the psychotype of your partner (this could be a loved one, colleague, boss, friend or relative) in the very top line of this table.
You track the intersection of the two psychotypes you need.
Below is a list with which you can decipher the abbreviation that appears in the intersection cell.

As a result of all these actions, you will be able to draw appropriate conclusions about what kind of relationship you have with this or that person and why. And only after that determine competently and very carefully your line of behavior with him. As you can see, the central, key place in the table is occupied by socionistic abbreviations, which describe in detail the relationships between psychotypes.

Dual Relationships, or Complete Complement

The best and most necessary relationship for a person is family, friendship, and cooperation. Partners complement each other: where one is weak, the other is strong. Relationship of support, mutual complement. The dual perceives the dual as a reliable partner in any matter - whether we are talking about work or family life. It can be considered completely established that the most durable married couples are formed precisely by duals.

A special type of relationship between two partners – carriers of complementary personality types. Dual relationships are one of the main concepts of socionics and are characterized by mutual benefit and support, and are considered optimal for friendship, intimacy and marriage (although sociotype is not the only factor determining the success of interaction). Dual relationships are considered the “most important” relationships, since they are a manifestation of psychological compatibility, and are also the most suitable for creating a family, which is the practical significance of the phenomenon. Dual relationships are considered the best for many situations of interaction and communication: work, education, leisure and business partnerships.

What it is?

Socionics is a science or scientific discipline based on the concept of personality types created in the 1970s .

This concept divides people into 16 types, each of which has its own characteristic features.

Socionics is very popular in many countries of the world and especially in Russia.

Toxic relationships - what is it? Find out the answer right now.

Mirror relationships

It's difficult for two. Both constantly strive to teach and change each other. The appearance of the 3rd member of the quadra, who is the dual of one of them and the activator of the second, makes this collective very pleasant. It’s better to communicate not one on one, but with other members of your quadra, then everything will be fine. In these relationships, the partners are quite similar - they are both ethical or logical, sensory or intuitive, but one is an extrovert and the other is an introvert. They also differ on the “rationality – irrationality” scale. With such interaction, there is an active exchange of information on strong functions. What one speaks or thinks about, the other implements without further ado. They have a lot to learn from each other, although sometimes this leads to the temptation to lecture their partner. Conflicts are unlikely here.

Mirror relationships are interesting for communication and joint activities; partners have common values and often interests; Constructive criticism is possible. The strengths and weaknesses are largely the same. From the point of view of model A, the program function intersects with the creative function of the “mirror”, the role function with the pain function, the suggestive function with the activation function, and the observation function with the demonstrative function.

Conflict relationships

Conflicts constantly get into each other’s pet peeves – good for self-knowledge. If you marry a dual, you will be happy; if you marry a conflicter, you will become a philosopher. The main thing is psychological distance, emphasized politeness and no attempts to pour out your soul! Of course, there can be no talk of any harmony in close (for example, family) relationships here. But in the case when these people communicate over a long distance, for example, they are members of the same club, they can very fruitfully use the advice of each other and even maintain long-term “distance” friendship if they treat each other with respect. But, of course, when communicating at close range, conflict is inevitable.

Relationships of sluggish, latent conflict; Such relationships are characterized by constant and often fruitless attempts to achieve mutual understanding and growing internal tension. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one partner falls into the pain function of the other partner, and the creative function falls into the role function (the conflictor does not intentionally, but constantly points out the weak points of the partner), the observation function falls into the activation function, and the demonstration function falls into the suggestive function. The relationship is extremely unfavorable for living together and family relationships, however, it can be useful in work provided that it is parallel rather than joint work.

Mirage relationships

There is a lack of frankness; This relationship is boring. There are few conflicts, but there is a great lack of emotions and joy. They try to understand each other, but do not know how to guess the desires of the other. Good for relaxation; joint activities are not going well. In this case, it is easier for partners to maintain good relations in matters that are not too serious or somewhere on vacation together. One develops an attitude towards a partner as a lightweight, not too serious, although nice, sweet person with whom it is good to be in the same company, but not very tempting to enter into business contact with him. However, in family life, for those for whom the factor of psychological comfort dominates, these relationships can be quite favorable.

The relationship is quite comfortable and pleasant, but does not satisfy the needs of the partners in everything, and contributes to relaxation and rest. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one partner falls on the observational function of the other (hence possible disagreements), the creative function - on the activation function (which gives warmth to the relationship), the role function - on the suggestive function (which generates dissatisfaction), the demonstrative function covers up the painful partner. The relationship is quite favorable for family life, but ineffective for joint activities.

Areas of use

Knowledge of the basics of socionics gives good returns in the following cases:

Staffing classes and study groups. A harmonious combination of the temperamental characteristics of the types contributes to a friendly working atmosphere and automatic resolution of discipline problems.
Subject-differentiated training in high school and university seminars, where the priority will be the “club”, discussion method of considering issues.
Individual approach to students to provide opportunities for self-realization.

Knowledge of the types of people in socionics simplifies management consultations for organizations and contributes to the creation of a stable team of broad-spectrum employees and target groups for the implementation of specific tasks. Sociologically competent staff formation saves people’s money, time and nerves.

The best sociotypes in business

Pseudoscience makes an invaluable contribution to self-development and harmonization of relationships in the family and society. Perception of oneself, possible scenarios for the development of relationships helps to identify hidden mechanisms of quarrels, misunderstandings, and prevents the likelihood of irreparable mistakes.

Activation Relationships

Activation is also a very good relationship. Partners mutually activate each other. Occasionally you need to rest. Unlike dual relationships, there is no jealousy here: there can be many activators. These relationships are favorable, although not to the same extent as dual ones. There is some tension due to the lack of full compensation. Tiredness of each other can occur due to different rhythms of life, since one partner is rational, and the other is irrational.

Activation relationships are light and pleasant, established quickly and easily. Any area of activity turns out to be in the zone of the strong functions of one of the partners, however, they have different rhythms of life (rational and irrational), moreover, both are extroverts or introverts, and with prolonged communication they tend to get tired of each other. From the point of view of model A, the program function of the activator supplies information to the activation function, the creative function to the suggestive function, the observation function controls the activity of the painful function, and the demonstrative function controls the activity of the role function, while blows from restrictive to painful ones can be quite painful. Relationships are good for relaxation and good times.

Table of relationships between psychotypes in socionics

Table of intertype relationships between psychotypes

ESE

LII

EIE

PWD

SLE

IEI

SEE

LIE

ESI

FEL

EII

IEE

SLI

ILE

Z›

TO>

Del

Z‹

TO<

front

SEI

TO>

Z›

Del

TO<

Z‹

front

ESE

front

Z‹

TO<

Del

Z›

TO>

LII

front

TO<

Z‹

Del

TO>

Z›

EIE

Z‹

TO<

front

Z›

TO>

Del

PWD

TO<

Z‹

front

TO>

Z›

Del

SLE

Del

Z›

TO>

front

Z‹

TO<

IEI

Del

TO>

Z›

front

TO<

Z‹

SEE

Z‹

TO<

front

Z›

TO>

Del

TO<

Z‹

front

TO>

Z›

Del

LIE

Del

Z›

TO>

front

Z‹

TO<

ESI

Del

TO>

Z›

front

TO<

Z‹

FEL

Z›

TO>

Del

Z‹

TO<

front

EII

TO>

Z›

Del

TO<

Z‹

front

IEE

front

Z‹

TO<

Del

Z›

TO>

SLI

front

TO<

Z‹

Del

TO>

Z›

Quasi-identity relations

There are no quarrels, but many arguments that are never fruitful. It is impossible to prove anything to each other. They talk about the same things, are interested in the same things, but from completely different points of view.

Relations of peaceful coexistence with coincidence of strengths and weaknesses and divergence of values and interests. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one “quasi-person” corresponds to the demonstrative function of another, creative - observational, role - activation, pain - suggestive.

A relationship of complete opposites

They communicate well in private, marveling at the uniqueness of their interlocutor’s approach. The third upsets their balance. They think about the same thing, but from different positions. Partners look at the same problems from opposite sides. One, for some functions, is oriented towards an external object, for others - towards his own subjective opinion and feeling. For others, everything happens exactly the opposite. Communication, in the end, turns out to be very superficial, conversations seem to be in different languages. It is very difficult to do anything together because attention is absent even in small things. There is no way to coordinate your actions. At the beginning of their acquaintance, such partners attract each other mainly due to their incomprehensibility, even mystery. Therefore, unfortunately, there are quite a lot of married couples where the husband and wife are in a relationship of complete opposites. It is not surprising that there is no harmony in such a family; the relationship is so tense that the spouses are constantly teetering on the brink of divorce or ending up that way.

Relationships of complete opposites (repayment) - partners have similar strengths and weaknesses, however, in communication and joint activities, mutual repayment occurs, one partner seems to hinder the activities of the other. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one partner falls into the observational function, and the creative function falls into the demonstrative function (which together gives the extinction effect), the role function falls into the suggestive function, and the pain function falls into the activation function.

Description of personality types and their characteristics

There are 16 personality types (male and female). Their names are the same for men and women; small differences for people of different sexes must be studied after determining the type.

The typology is based on the fact that each of the psychotypes has its own meaning in each of four parameters:

logic (subordinate the whole world to logic) / ethics (understands the relationships between people);
sensory (emphasis on real phenomena) / intuition (emphasis on thoughts);
rationality (rational people plan everything)/ irrationality (irrational people plan nothing);
extraversion (directed towards the outside world) / introversion (directed inward).

In addition to the use of the word type, in various literature one can find such terms as type of information metabolism (IMT), sociotype, psychotype.

A brief description of each of the 16 types looks something like this:

Dostoevsky is an introvert who tends to take everything very personally. Such people, as a rule, are aloof from others and communicate only with good acquaintances and friends. You may get the feeling that they are not living, but watching the lives of others. They are very polite and well-mannered, they are never rude and always think about the convenience of others, trying not to interfere with them. But their main feature is their high ability to empathize. Dostoevsky knows how to empathize and literally feels what is going on in the souls of other people. Dostoevsky always sees what kind of relationships his acquaintances actually have and knows how people from his circle really treat him. He has a very rich world of feelings and experiences, but does not show this to anyone. He is always very neat and neatly dressed, and is critical of his own appearance.
Jack London - a very hardworking person, his energy literally boils and splashes out. It seems that he is not able to just stand still or even walk slowly, he always needs to run somewhere.
He loves to show everyone how fearless he is, he is the first to rush into all sorts of adventures.
He is inattentive to his own appearance, often looks disheveled and unkempt, loves life very much, constantly chats and jokes, strives to cheer everyone up, since he himself is an incorrigible optimist and is always in high spirits.
Stirlitz knows how to make decisions quickly and accurately, always acts intelligently and logically.
He likes to take the initiative and be in the center of everyone's attention, is able to work for a very long time, and practically does not get tired. He is always very confident in himself, never shy or timid; rather, on the contrary, he shows aggression towards others. Always ready, foaming at the mouth, to prove that he is right and defend his own ideas and beliefs. As a rule, he dresses beautifully and elegantly, and hates cunning and cheating. Considers honesty and adherence to rules to be one of his strongest traits and demands the same from others.
Hamlet always very serious, paints the world around him in very dark colors, and overly dramatizes. His thoughts are constantly occupied with global problems. Does not like to be in the center of attention and to manage other people, prone to constant doubts and hesitations. He puts feelings above reason; many would call Hamlet an incorrigible romantic. He takes any work very seriously, carefully thinks through and plans everything, is able to maintain strength until the very end, never burns out and always finishes what he starts.
He does not tolerate evil and evil people, but his concepts of good and evil are very original and based on his own preferences.
He sympathizes with other people and tries to help them, sometimes too intrusively. From the outside he may seem arrogant and does not like to work in front of other people.
Hugo has very bright and strong emotions, is able to light up in childhood and then carry his dream throughout his life.
Has a kind and compassionate character. Ready to take on any job, completes it very quickly and always finishes it. He doesn't like to talk too much, he is a man of action. As a rule, he achieves excellent results in his activities, but is not very confident in himself, and therefore needs praise from others. Hugo is a trusting and non-envious person; he is very happy when he manages to cheer up another person. Able to listen carefully to other people. He does not allow himself to be offended, but nevertheless is not aggressive. Pays too much attention to others, this distracts him from his own activities. Likes to choose new clothes, takes care of his appearance, hates disorder in everything, including appearance. He has few close friends, because not everyone can withstand his emotional pressure.
Robespierre has a very developed ability to analyze and is always very logical.
Loves to get to the bottom of things. He places high demands on himself and values justice very much. He does not like to choose his own clothes, he completely relies on his partner in this matter, and often does not think at all about what he is wearing. Doesn't like being bossed around. Very withdrawn and silent. He is secretive, does not like guests, reacts very sharply to criticism addressed to him, and takes very serious care of his health.
Gorky is always very calm and reasonable, adheres to his own system and routine in everything, and never panics.
He doesn’t like dreamers, just as he doesn’t like to fantasize. Able to listen carefully to other people, thoroughly studies any problem. Likes to be alone and think. In general, thinking is his favorite pastime. Closed, secretive, very patient and unpretentious, unobtrusive in communication. Doesn't like to waste time choosing clothes or doing any household activities in general. Does not trust other people and treats them with caution. Despite this, he is an excellent organizer, makes only the same demands on his employees as he does on himself, does not look down on them and is always ready to listen. Thanks to these qualities, Gorky becomes an excellent boss, which is why this type is also called a guardian in socionics.
Dreiser is very polite and tactful, and easily gains the trust of other people. Doesn't show his emotions, doesn't tolerate betrayal. In the company of friends he is sociable and talkative, but among strangers he is almost always silent. He is extremely intolerant of any manifestations of untidiness and will never appear in public in bad clothes. Doesn't like to wait, is always very punctual.
Don Quixote lives in the future, not the present.
Constantly needs new emotions. He's a good boss and generally has a good understanding of people. He loves compliments and positive emotions from others. He is almost impossible to scare; he likes to take the initiative in emergency situations.
Zhukov is a very purposeful person, ready to achieve his goal no matter what. He cares what others think of him. He always reserves the last word and has a stern and decisive character. Doesn't adapt to other people, always tells them what to do. He behaves decisively in any situation, does not like to talk about his feelings.
Huxley loves to improvise, loves everything new, and expresses his thoughts very emotionally. Extremely sensitive when his ideas are criticized, ready to help others. Huxley is a man of mood and it changes very often.
Napoleon is very proud of being loved and respected, does not hide his feelings, is arrogant and optimistic. Knows how to dress well and demands the same from others. He is not afraid of criticism, he is always very businesslike and proactive.
Balzac has a very vivid imagination, almost never shows his emotions. He loves to analyze everything and is a very kind person by nature.
Gabin is a very reserved and cold person, his movements are always precise and restrained.
Always finishes what he starts, very persistent. Calm under any circumstances, will not work if he does not consider the matter worth attention.
Yesenin is a dreamy romantic who likes to think rather than act. He doesn’t hide his feelings, falls in love easily, and always looks very elegant. Elegance is visible not only in his clothes, but also in all his movements. Loves to stir people up and evoke bright emotions in them.
Dumas is always very friendly and optimistic. He hides his real experiences and never asks for help from others. Always cares about other people, does not know how to argue or refuse, and does not like to express himself brightly.

How to get out of a codependent relationship? Find out about this from our article.

Half-complement relations

Half complement - good relationship. However, a sudden loss of mutual understanding out of the blue is possible. But they make up quickly and easily. When people get to know each other, make plans, agree on business, everything goes great, no worse than with duals. But when they begin to implement their plans, it turns out that both have the same area where both are not strong - therefore, they cannot effectively help each other. Since there is no full compensation, there may be some disappointment when getting close enough.

Incomplete complement relations. There is mutual interest in communication, but serious problems are possible when trying to get closer. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one partner falls on the suggestive function of the other (which causes mutual interest), the creative function of one partner intersects with the demonstrative function of the other partner, the role function intersects with the observational function, and the pain function intersects with the activation function (which causes some dissatisfaction with the partner) .

Audit relationships

One of the most dangerous types of relationships. People systematically hit each other where it hurts the most. Both suffer from social control - the person being audited (controlled) constantly suffers from the controller, but he himself cannot “get” him. But it’s not very good for the controller either - the person under control annoys him. The person under control feels extremely uncomfortable, the controller seems to him to be petty and meticulous, and precisely in those issues on which he would not like to focus the attention of others.

An asymmetrical relationship in which the auditor constantly, although unintentionally, points out to the sub-auditor his weak point, sometimes trying to re-educate him. From the point of view of model A, the program function of the auditor falls on the pain function of the supervisor (the cause of discomfort for the supervisor), creative - on program, role - on creative, pain - on role, suggestive - on demonstrative, activation - on suggestive, observation - on activation, demonstrative - to observational. Relationships are unfavorable for living together and family relationships (in some ways even more dangerous than conflict ones, which are mutually dangerous and force partners to maintain distance), however, a normal mode of existence is possible if partners do not consciously touch each other’s points of least resistance (pain functions).

Why is socionics needed?

The concept of socionics helps to better understand yourself and others, productively solve personal and professional problems, discover true talents and realize yourself in the right direction. Basic knowledge of personality prototypes also allows you to find common ground in controversial issues between family, friends, and strangers, and to accept your opponent’s worldview.

Interesting. If you correctly determine the sociotypes of people, it will not be difficult to predict their behavior in certain situations. Understanding the characteristics of sociotypes simplifies the selection of work teams. For individual tasks, it is worth selecting a candidate who can cope in the best possible way.

Social order relations

The receiver perceives any grumbling from the customer as a signal to action. However, for this action he must move away from him. In a family - and this is difficult in a family - relationships are tense. It seems to the customer that without him the receiver is completely lost, and the receiver considers it impossible to leave such an outstanding, strong person. The customer activates the customer, but in order to realize this impulse, he must move away from him for some time. The most romantic love stories: partners come together, separate, can’t live without each other, can’t live with each other (“Winter Cherry”). Not the best marriages. One of the partners is called the “customer” - this is the one who, from his “creative” channel, activates the weak function of the “customer” channel. There is no good feedback here, since both strong functions of the sub-order do not affect the customer. This mechanism also determines the nature of the relationship: everything that the customer says and does seems to the customer to be not very important and significant, and the customer, on the contrary, is perceived by the customer as a very significant figure. This order is impossible not to fulfill: it is perceived by the weak channel function, which itself is not able to critically understand the information. Therefore, it is carried out unconditionally. The customer is not inclined to take into account the sub-customer, seeing the sub-customer as a weaker partner, so he seeks to patronize the sub-customer, manage him, or even teach him. Naturally, the contractor strives, on occasion, to distance himself from the customer. In a family, these relationships are satisfactory only on the condition that the customer is engaged in some active activity outside the family, then he can transfer the energy received from the customer further along the ring. If there is no such activity, there is a high probability of conflict, even to the point of rupture.

Asymmetrical relationships in which the customer usually has more influence on the customer than the customer on the customer. In such relationships, the customer may somewhat underestimate the partner, and the customer may try to either please the partner or resist his influence. From the point of view of model A, the customer’s program function falls on the demonstrative function of the subordinate, the creative function falls on the suggestive function, the role function falls on the activation function, the pain function falls on the observation function, the suggestive function falls on the pain function, the activation function falls on the program function, the observation function falls on the creative function, and the demonstrative function falls on the role function.

Typing

Who am I? How to determine your type? There are several different ways to determine your sociotype:

First, you need to take a test to determine your type. This is the fastest method that is available to every person; the test is very easy to find on the Internet. You need to answer all questions extremely honestly, you don’t need to try to show yourself in a more favorable light.
You can type people by appearance and by their behavior .
To use this method, you need to observe a person for some time, and you also need to know the distinctive features of all types. This method is less reliable than a test, but with its help you can determine the sociotype of your friends. For example, it is used to determine the sociotype of V.V. Putin. Many agree that his type is Robespierre.
Typing in the form of an interview . In order to use this method, you need to contact a specialist who will determine the sociotype based on an interview, observation of a person’s behavior, and a test. This method can give the most reliable results.

Superego relationships

You are constantly haunted by the thought that your partner is doing everything on purpose to spite you. Fine as long as you both care about each other. If a quarrel does occur, this concern disappears and the conflict becomes unexpectedly “loud.” The interests of the partners are completely different, communication is difficult, they cannot rely on each other, and conflicts often arise.

Relationships of mutual respect and sympathy, which, however, when moving to a close psychological distance, can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings. From the point of view of model A, the program function of one partner falls on the role function of the other (which is why the effect of admiration arises), and the creative function falls on the pain function (which irritates and can lead to conflicts), the observation function falls on the suggestive function, and the demonstration function falls on the activation function. The relationship is not suitable for living together and family relationships.

Family relationships

Lack of frankness. Partners seem selfish to each other, although in reality this is not always the case. Your partner is similar to you. Both partners perceive the world very similarly in some areas. Where business activity is concerned, these relationships can be quite fruitful if the partners have the same interests. But if their common interests diverge, the relationship can be harsh, unpleasant, and annoying.

Complex relationships with similar life attitudes and opposing programs for their implementation. From the point of view of model A, the program, role, suggestive and activation functions of the partners coincide, the creative function of one partner falls into the pain function (which is annoying and can lead to conflicts), and the demonstrative function falls into the activation function. Relationships are unfavorable for family life.

Areas of application and benefits of the science of sociotypes

Generally speaking, a sociotype is, in some way, the internal horoscope of each of us. Is it worth knowing your horoscope, how to apply this knowledge in life - it’s up to you to decide.

Whether you are a logical-sensory introvert or an intuitive-logical introvert or a completely different type - it matters, essentially, only when you know how to use and apply this knowledge in a practical aspect. People tend to categorize and define everything, that's our nature.

The application of typing concepts is widely used in practice in personnel management. Here they help during personnel selection, for the formation of a cohesive team and for more efficient functioning of management in the company.

Another area of application of socionics is organizing dating. There are entire dating services where dating is based on socionic typing. Also, with the help of socionic methods and practices, groups are selected to organize training, for education and training.

Knowledge in the field of socionics gives a significant advantage. It involves working with innate personality structures. The approach allows us to understand people’s behavior, predict their reactions, and reveal the characteristics of relationships with parents and children.

Author of the article Elena Zhurba

https://youtube.com/watch?v=XwbS5yab7YE